Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
Rick, I do not suggest that the makers of specs are responsible for vendor's product cycle decisions. As a developer who minors in spec writing, I don't even think that's true. Of course the spec-writers are not responsible. The developers are responsible. Are there any responsible developers here? Have a nice day. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick JELLIFFE" <ricko@g...> To: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 5:17 AM Subject: Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces) > Dave Winer wrote: > > > My pov: XML should be providing a means for interop between all kinds of > > apps. It should be happening now. > > "Should" > seems to suggest that the makers of specs are responsible for vendor's > product cycle decisions. If applications have a 3 year life, and if it > takes 2 product cycles to get anything well-integrated, then we can > start to say "should" in about 2004. Perhaps incremental updates over > the Web should speed this up. > > Cheers > Rick Jelliffe
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format