RE: Who will maintain SAX?
The statement is debatable. SAX is oriented to the events the infoSet describes. This is one level out from "application vocabularies" so one can say it is infrastructure. It is not necessarily "network infrastructure" but this may be slicing thin. As I watch this thread, I am beginning to think OASIS may be the better candidate. At least in the notion that SAX is a markup API, OASIS is a markup standards organization. Does anyone else have some reasons why OASIS would or would not be a good org to own the SAX record of authority? Len Bullard Intergraph Public Safety clbullar@i... http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: John Evdemon [mailto:john.evdemon@x...] Problem: SAX is really applications-oriented, not infrastructure. Would IETF even be interested in this?
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format