[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX2/Java: Known Bugs

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:26:09 -0400 (EDT)

Elliotte Rusty Harold writes:
 > At 4:23 PM -0400 10/25/00, David Megginson wrote:
 > >I've put a list of known SAX2/Java bugs at
 > >
 > >   http://www.megginson.com/SAX/bugs.html
 > >
 > 
 > There only seems to be one bug there and it's an implementation bug 
 > in a helper class, not an API bug. Consequently I'd like to suggest 
 > that you not call the new release SAX 2.0.1 since that implies (to 
 > me, at least) that the API has changed. That is, SAX means the 
 > general API, not a specific implementation of the API. Maybe SAX2 
 > second edition or SAX2 1.0.1 would make the distinction a tad 
 > clearer? But the real issue here is distinguishing between a new 
 > release of the implementation and a new release of the API.

An excellent point.  Any other version-numbering suggestions?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX2/Java: Known Bugs
    • From: Daniel Barclay <Daniel.Barclay@d...>

• References:
  • SAX2/Java: Known Bugs
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX2/Java: Known Bugs
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: foo:space instead of xml:space?
• Next by Date: Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2/Java: Known Bugs
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2/Java: Known Bugs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread