|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: MoreStupidXMLArtic
Funny that this is getting so much play on the list. As computer scientists, haven't we realized that no single paradigm perfectly fits every problem? We make tradeoffs in every solution, trying to minimize the pain and maximize efficiency, but never entirely ridding ourselves of the pain and never quite building the perfect system. We know this is true, even with XML. But we know it's a better solution for interop and a world of other issues that currently plague our field. To this end, Dvorak isn't entirely wrong. XML looks complicated to the non-programmer. But try to remember that people like Dvorak aren't necessarily familiar with the alternatives that XML replaces. He has heard too much of "one-size-fits-all" solutions that are swaddled in marketing hype, and doesn't have the deeper exposure and understanding that we have. Plus, I'm sure that he'd be happy to know he [expletive deleted] some folks off. :) Michael Maddox Senior Software Engineer Hayes Tallahassee, Florida, USA -----Original Message----- From: Edd Dumbill [mailto:edd@u...] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 6:18 PM To: Simon St.Laurent Cc: Bullard, Claude L (Len); xml-dev Subject: Re: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArticles)) On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 05:49:50PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: > Why is this list getting so hyper-sensitive about any press that suggests > XML isn't perfect? I'll gladly entertain notions that XML isn't perfect, but I won't do so on the basis of an obivously erroneous (not just controversial) article. -- Edd
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








