[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: standards body parallel

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: xml-dev@x...
  • Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:19:04 -0400

unincorporated standards body
At 01:06 PM 10/13/00 -0400, Jonathan.Robie@S... wrote: 
>
> This looks like a rather different model from that of the W3C, which was
> designed to provide a vendor-neutral forum. The people quoted in your
article
> seem to have been upset largely by the fact that their forum was dominated
> and controlled by one vendor. On the Working Groups, each company gets one
> vote - sure, big companies have more resources for lobbying, and are more
> likely to be able to devote full-time developers to help with the technical
> work.


Intel's position appears to be the only aspect of the model substantially
different from the W3C.

>Nied said the group would be administered by a steering committee 
>of seven companies chaired by Intel. Two of the seven would be 
>elected by "contributors" -- companies or individuals that pay 
>$5,000 to submit ideas to technical committees and get early access to
>specifications. "Steering committee" members would pay $25,000, and
>"participant" members could join for $500. 
>
>Non-disclosure agreements would be discouraged. Companies would have 
>to prove their own copyrights and prepare to subject their 
>intellectual property to the rules of standards bodies. "This is 
>like an unincorporated trade association," Nied said. "We want 
>something very simple."

I don't find the notable point here to be Intel's role - Sun's done very
similar things with their Java Community Process.

What I find notable is that a community of developers (finally) voiced their
lack of interest in such centralizing and exclusive processes.  

Note Tim O'Reilly:
>
> "The IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) has a good working model [for
> projects like this], and you propose an organization where the big players
> have all the power."


Cisco wants Intel to look at the W3C structure as a model, but I'd suggest
that
there's more wrong here than just Intel's position as chair.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.