[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Is Schema Equivalence transitive?

• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: Ramesh Gupta <ramesh@e...>
• Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:59:37 +0100

Ramesh Gupta <ramesh@e...> writes:

> If both <B> and <C> are equivalent to <A> (for substitution), then are they
> also equivalent to each other? In other words, can <B> be substituted
> anywhere <C> may occur (without using xsi:type)?

No.  Either for <A>, nothing else is possible.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Schema Substitutability Is Transitive?
    • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>

• References:
  • Is Schema Equivalence transitive?
    • From: Ramesh Gupta <ramesh@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Next by Date: RE: RELAX to ISO
• Previous by thread: Is Schema Equivalence transitive?
• Next by thread: Re: Schema Substitutability Is Transitive?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread