|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Community help on W3C XML Schemas
> From: Rick JELLIFFE [mailto:ricko@g...] > [...] > I would like to renew my call for people to make concrete > suggestions on > improving the text of W3C XML Schemas. > > I am particularly interested in knowing the points at which people who > get lost or stymied or frustrated. Are there terms that are > not defined > sufficiently? Well, one point that I noticed just recently is ambiguity in the spec regarding time zones for date/time datatypes. Time zone indicators are identified as "optional", but the spec offers no explicit guidance for implementations on how to deal with date/time datatypes that omit a time zone indicator. Should they be treated as being in the local time zone of the receiving application? Should they be treated as UTC? Would an application that rejects date/time datatypes that don't specify time zone be violating the schema spec? Would it be violating the schema spec if it treated just values as UTC? I posted a question to this list regarding this just a few days ago, but got no response. I think the specs should address this ambiguity.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








