[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: sunshine and standards development

• From: Matt Sergeant <matt@s...>
• To: Bill dehOra <wdehora@c...>
• Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:23:23 +0100 (BST)

On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Bill dehOra wrote:

> The W3C is funded by self-interested entities. If these entities are basing
> business strategy on the outcomes of the W3C's end-products (normative
> recommendations) and are arguing their case technically and strategically,
> and assuming (as I do) that are no technological motives for technology then
> it's a reasonable act of self-interest for them to ask for non-disclosure. 

This is the argument I have a real problem with. If the W3C is closed
simply so that the member organisations can get a "leg-up" over, say,
someone wanting to implement an open source equivalent of said
specification then something is really wrong with the system. How can this
situation end up with anything *but* competing implementations, rather
than interoperable, compatible implementations?

> Simply, the internet is not and never has been, free. 

Maybe you got there after I did. I remember a pretty free internet, when
companies didn't even know what the internet *was* (and I'm not even very
old!).

-- 
<Matt/>

    /||    ** Director and CTO **
   //||    **  AxKit.com Ltd   **  ** XML Application Serving **
  // ||    ** http://axkit.org **  ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP  **
 // \\| // **     Personal Web Site: http://sergeant.org/     **
     \\//
     //\\
    //  \\

• References:
  • RE: sunshine and standards development
    • From: Bill dehOra <wdehora@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: sunshine and standards development
• Next by Date: Re: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
• Previous by thread: RE: sunshine and standards development
• Next by thread: Re: sunshine and standards development
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread