• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: lisarein@f...
• Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:47:42 -0500

You have a good idea.  Refine the 
execution.  For example, you got the feedback 
for submitting an article for consideration.  
If enough people read it and agree with it, 
don't put it on the page.  If enough people 
on this list say, "whadda crock!", then you 
have a good candidate for the home of notorious 
bad articles promoting known shibboleths.

Deal with the process.  You have one emerging. 
Cool.

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Rein [mailto:lisarein@f...]


okay this is where i gracefully bow out of this entire thread, and end
up apologizing to the list for even starting it.

Darn! :-)

lisa

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
• Next by Date: Re: King of Stupid XML Articles?
• Previous by thread: Re: King of Stupid XML Articles?
• Next by thread: Re: King of Stupid XML Articles?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread