• From: Murata Makoto <mura034@a...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 00:49:05 +0900

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> RELAX takes, I think, a sugar-free approach of making you declare types
> before/separately 
> to binding them to element names. 

Actually, in RELAX, you can always swap two subordinates (except 
interface elements) of modules, and you are guaranteed to get the 
same result.  That is, the physical order of subordinates of modules 
is not important.

>But this results in very shallow trees
> and therefore 
> more cross-referencing: 

????



Makoto
 
Internet: mura034@a...
Nifty: VEQ00625

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD for OPML
• Next by Date: Translation to XML
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing versus in-lining
• Next by thread: What happened to XPATH?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread