• From: ramesh@e...
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:30:50 -0700

Section 2.5.3 in the XML Schema Part 0: Primer describes how to define an
empty complex type.

The example uses restriction while adding a couple attributes to the type.
Is that a typo? I expected to use extension in this case.

I also found <xsd:complexType mixed="true"> a little jarring in the example
in section 2.5.2, because I was expecting <xsd:mixedContent> for consistency
with <xsd:simpleContent> and <xsd:complexContent>, but this may already have
been covered in earlier debates. If that's the case, please disregard this
comment.

Thanks for clarifying.

• Prev by Date: [Fwd: DOM Level 1 Second Edition Working Draft]
• Next by Date: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Previous by thread: [Fwd: DOM Level 1 Second Edition Working Draft]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread