• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:56:34 -0500

Having never contributed, I don't have a vote, 
but Apache looks like the best place, IMO.  It is 
the least political and the most likely to 
take immediate advantage of the code to 
broaden the features.

The question is, given that SAX has received 
broad support from the vendors, will having 
it reside at Apache rather than a specification 
consortium cause them to reconsider it and 
initiate projects to replace it?  Apache 
can in some sense, be considered a competitor 
for footprint if not revenue.

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by Date: Re: King of Stupid XML Articles?
• Previous by thread: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by thread: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread