[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining

• From: Curt Arnold <CurtA@t...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 12:58:16 -0500

Martin Bryan wrote:
> am I right in inferring that a  valid XML content model of (a, b, c, b) cannot be expressed using a schema?

No, the constraint that was quoted is on the top-level declarations in a
schema.  It is saying you can't do:

<schema...>
	<element name="b">
		<complexType>
			...
		</complexType>
	</element>
	<element name="b">
		<complexType>
			...
		</complexType>
	</element>
</schema>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
    • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@s...>

• References:
  • RE: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
    • From: Curt Arnold <CurtA@t...>
  • Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
    • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@s...>

• Prev by Date: Inserting optional elements
• Next by Date: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
• Next by thread: Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread