Re: Why the Infoset?
Sean McGrath wrote: > The W3C infoset work seems to be to bless two levels > of abstraction: > a) XML entities are a stream of bytes > b) XML entities consist of elements,attributes,data ... > (all the stuff in the Infoset doc) Actually, there are (a1) the byte level and (a2) the character level. Both are important. > (X) This is the space where what SGML called > "markup sensitive" apps. live. Apps that care about the > difference between "Hello world" and "&greeting;". > Apps that care about default attribute values etc. etc. > > (Y) This is the space where high fidelity roundtripping apps > live. Apps that care about the difference between: > <name first = "Sean" last = "Mc Grath"/> > and: > <name > last = 'Mc Grath' > first = 'Sean'></name> I think it's pretty arbitrary of you to call the Y level "high fidelity", just as it's arbitrary for me to call the b level "the Infoset". But we both agree that a line must be drawn somewhere. > There needs to be N infosets (N > 1) to cover > the range of application types people build with > XML. We used to have that explicitly, with a "minimal infoset", a "maximal infoset" and every possible infoset in between. It was a mess to describe. Now we have: 1) one standard infoset 2) conformance means documentation of what you provide and what you don't 3) any app can add its own info items and properties (right down to the a level if you want) 4) the "core conformance" infoset is one possible subset -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format