Re: Why the Infoset?
At 04:58 PM 8/3/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > >> Either define abstractions for XML or don't > >The Infoset *does* define abstractions for XML. It doesn't define >every possible abstraction for XML. More to the point, it doesn't define abstractions for all of XML, leaving them as 'fix in documentation' for those who need more than the Infoset currently provides. As the Infoset itself is basically documentation, this doesn't seem reasonable. 'Every possible abstraction' for XML is more possibilities than I think either of us care to think about. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format