[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - FinalReviewDraft)

• From: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@d...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 20:39:56 -0600

> >>
> >> Whose current direction?
> >
> >The direction of the W3C and the world of component/system developers wrt
> >type information.
>
> Really?  I'd love to see that formally stated by the W3C.
>

It doesn't have to be, it's implied by their efforts. Just look how much
time and energy has gone into XML's type system.

> I suspect we have an honest difference of opinion between one group of
> 'component/system developers' and another.

That may be the case.

> XSD and XInclude aren't
> universally adored, and neither are 'fundamental abstractions',
> I'm afraid.

Depends on your definition of 'universally'. ;~)  In the strictest sense,
*nothing* is universally adored.

-aaron

• References:
  • RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML -FinalReviewDraft)
• Next by Date: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Previous by thread: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
• Next by thread: Re: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - FinalReviewDraft)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread