[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Why the Infoset?

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@i...>, 'Steve Harris' <sharris@p...>,xml-dev@x...
• Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 13:15:17 -0500

And now possibly the InfoSet.

NIH:  Weird how that works.

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Kay Michael [mailto:Michael.Kay@i...]

> As I'm fond of saying around here, "Groves are the greatest thing I've
> never seen or completely understood."

with the possible exception of Architectural Forms.

Mike Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Why the Infoset?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTDs aren't going away even when schemas arrive (was Re:Aretherestill a lot of people using DTD rather than schema?)
• Next by Date: RE: SGML, XML, redux
• Previous by thread: RE: Why the Infoset?
• Next by thread: RE: Why the Infoset?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread