• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:53:11 -0400

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> How does RDF stack up next to UML for modeling semantics?
> 
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000May/0154.html

Jonathan Borden
http://www.openhealth.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re:Default Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
    • From: johns@s... (John F. Schlesinger)

• References:
  • RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re: Def ault Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: unsubscribe xml-dev
• Next by Date: RE: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re:Default Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
• Previous by thread: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re: Def ault Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
• Next by thread: RE: RDF or UML (Was RE: XML and Healthcare,RDF spec bug was: Re:Default Namespaces - why don't they apply toattributes?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread