[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: power uses of XML vs. simple uses of XML

• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: 'XML-Dev Mailing list' <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:47:52 -0400

> Considering that most people spend most of their time in Office 2000,
> IE5 and (Mozilla in the future, hopefully). Also, both Microsoft
> (Universal Canvas) and Mozilla folks are moving to a universal
> rendering/editing system, where users would spend most of their
> interaction time, I would hesitate to label that as a special case ;-)

XML is used, and has been used for much more than this though.

Here's a question: how do you know that the application is going to
deal with namespaces correctly? How do you bind the semantics
of *your* namespace?

• References:
  • RE: power uses of XML vs. simple uses of XML
    • From: Ashvil <ashvil@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: power uses of XML vs. simple uses of XML
• Next by Date: Is it possible to cascade schemas?
• Previous by thread: RE: power uses of XML vs. simple uses of XML
• Next by thread: RE: power uses of XML vs. simple uses of XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread