[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs

• From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>
• To: ",XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:45:50 +0800

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
 
> I've never seen nearly as much disagreement among 'Perl experts' regarding
> regexes as I've seen among 'XML experts' regarding namespaces, even
> fundamentals. 
...
> Now if only I was getting paid for all of these hours...

If only *we* were being paid to read all this stuff :-)

I have a modest suggestion: no-one should ever say anything is broken
again unless and until they also have a working proposal of how to fix
it. If we all kept to this discipline, XML-DEV would be more stimulating
for everyone, and lead into a more beautiful future.

Dr Newcombe is a good model in this: he questioned namespaces severely,
but in the light of what he thinks is an alternative addressing the
underlying problem as he sees it: architectural forms.

Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs
• Next by Date: Re: Public Identifiers
• Previous by thread: Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs
• Next by thread: Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread