• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Chris Pratt <chris@p...>, xml-dev@x...
• Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 12:57:22 -0500

Yes.  Make them smaller and focus them on 
event schedules.   If you make a DTD general 
enough to cover all of the possible states, 
it is too weak to validate any one of them 
at a given state.   Look at the enterprise 
of use and create multiple DTDs where the 
formal name is tied to the schedule.

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Pratt [mailto:chris@p...]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 3:43 PM
To: xml-dev@x...; Tim Bray
Subject: Re: Multiple DTD's


Is there a better way to utilize multiple DTD's?
    (*Chris*)

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Multiple DTD's
    • From: "Chris Pratt" <chris@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: power uses of XML vs. simple uses of XML
• Next by Date: Re: power uses of XML vs. simple uses of XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Multiple DTD's
• Next by thread: Re: Multiple DTD's
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread