Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Brennan wrote: > > ... > > I strongly agree with the above statement. Too many parties have tried to > get version 1.0 of the schema spec to solve too many problems. I think the > vast majority of developers just want the DTD functionality in XML syntax > with stronger data types now and are willing to wait for the other stuff as > they better digest the implications. Many of the complex features in XML Schema are intended to emulate sophisticated uses of DTDs. XML Schema will have a whole new problem if competent DTD designers will not move to Schemas because they are not as powerful as DTDs. -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus "Computer Associates is expected to come in with better than expected earnings." Bob O'Brien, quoted in - http://www.fool.com/news/2000/foth000316.htm *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
