Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Or do the smart thing and use XDR. It is a decent subset, will be compatible, and is fully supported in working code. The choice to carve out the controversial features and use the working subset is what a smart manager and developer chooses for products to be fielded on short deadlines with acceptance tests. This is engineering, not social work. Formal language theory may not have been the best pursuit if simplicity of exposition was key. I like the potential of schemas as presented, but like other specs, it may be a little bit ahead of its high time. Len Bullard Intergraph Public Safety clbullar@i... http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Michael Champion [mailto:Mike.Champion@s...] A development manager who says "I promised it with the specified features and within budget by the end of the second quarter, so it will ship on June 30th or heads will roll" is essentially saying "it's OK to have flaws". He/she may deny it, but we all know that that's the reality. *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
