Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Question About Namespaces and DTDs
Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> At 12:31 PM 7/25/00 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> > A schema language that's namespace aware is the answer.
>
> I have to admit that there are still too many days I wish someone had sat
> down and made DTDs namespace aware. It still doesn't seem that impossible
> a thing to do, though it's probably been too late for a long while.
Maybe it would suffice to leave DTDs as they are,
and build a namespace-aware DTD-based *validator*.
It might work something like this: A document could
indicate that a particular namespace URI is bound
to a DTD via a processing instruction:
<?xml-schema
href="urn:ndw:doctypes:docbook:3.1.7"
type="application/xml-dtd"
?>
The 'xml-schema' PI target is analogous to the 'xml-stylesheet'
target defined in [REC-xml-stylesheet]. The 'type' pseudo-attribute
indicates that the schema uses XML DTD notation (not sure what
the right MIME type for this is, if any). The 'href' pseudo-attribute
specifies a URI for the schema.
The XML Namespace mechanism can then be used to bind element type
names to the schema: in the document instances, any QNames with a
URI equal to the one specified in the 'xml-schema' PI would be validated
according to the specified DTD.
<db:article xmlns:db="urn:ndw:doctypes:docbook:3.1.7"
...
</db:article>
The text of the DTD itself could use NCNames, or even QNames
with a different prefix; the validator would only look at the
local-part of the name.
There are no doubt some issues to be resolved; for instance,
the usual namespace-related question -- do unprefixed attribute
names "belong to" the namespace of their parent element, the
default namespace, or to no namespace at all?
To be truly useful, such a validator would probably need to
be AFDR-aware as well. Namespaced documents generally mix
and match elements from several namespaces; the ArcCFC
and ArcSupr facilities could be used to deal with "data islands"
conforming to the DTD embedded in a larger document,
and "foreign objects" embedded inside those data islands.
At any rate, I don't think [REC-xml-names] irrevocably breaks DTDs;
it only breaks [REC-xml]'s definition of DTD-based validation.
--Joe English
jenglish@f...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
