[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Sasha Nakhimovsky <sasha@m...>
  • To: "'haustein@l...'" <haustein@l...>,Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:26:55 -0400

Can SOAP serialize an arbitrary Java object without loss of data?  What are
the constraints, if any?  A study of Section Five would of course yield the
answer, but I'm hoping that it already exists in a pre-packaged form.

adn

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Haustein [mailto:haustein@l...]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 9:45 AM
To: Andrew Layman
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?


Andrew Layman wrote:
> 
> SOAP section five specifically provides serialization rules for entire
> objects or graphs of objects. Its use is not limited to method calls but
is
> a general facility for serialization.

Wouldn't it be clearer to put section five into an own document, or 
to give it at least a name like SSF (SOAP Serialization Format) that 
can be simpler referenced than "SOAP section five"? (Oops, what does 
SSF actually mean - SOAP Serialization Format or SOAP Section five? :-)

My problem is: When I mention SOAP, I first need to explain 
that I do not mean HTTP+XML based RPC but the serialization format 
mentioned in section five of the spec...

Best,

Stefan

 


-- 
Stefan Haustein             
Univ. Dortmund, FB 4, LS 8   tel: +49 231 755 2499
Baroper Str. 301             fax: +49 231 755 5105
D-44221 Dortmund (Germany)   www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member