• From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:40:06 -0400

Jonathan Borden wrote:

> Let me first say that in describing your long arguments in favor of
> well-formedness and against the Infoset as a "rant", I did not intend to be
> too perjorative, nor imply that this was a "waste of bandwidth", and I would
> like to offer my sincerest apologies if you were offended.

No apology is required, but thank you. I felt that I should get out of the way
when it appeared my opinion was that of only the tiniest faction, perhaps just
me. I have since been informed that I am not entirely alone, however far in the
minority.

Best regards,

Walter Perry

• References:
  • Re: Why the Infoset?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Re: Why the Infoset?
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML in Office 200X
• Next by Date: Its the semantics dummy :-) was Re: Why XML? RE: Why the Infoset?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why the Infoset?
• Next by thread: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread