|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SAX2 Lexical Handler Suggestions
David Megginson wrote: > ... Besides, it's not just > *your* extension at stake -- other people will care just as strongly > about different features, and in the end, all XML-based tools and specs > will become CORBA-like (bloated, unusable, mutually-incompatible, and > nearly impossible for a sane person to understand). ... Oops too late :-) I know many people who think that about XML 1.0 (without namespaces, schemas, paths, pointers, links, transformations) etc. It seems that people define their sanity by how well they can explain life around them; up pops XML like a Martian and many people have legitimate difficulties figuring it out. Many other people are practical: they cannot understand something until they use it. But is this problem with the techonology or something intrinsic to humans? Some things that are difficult at first are simple later (e.g. driving) but other things that are easy at first cause untold complications later (e.g. forgetting about i18n in standards) or selfishly defer the complication to others (e.g. WAI accessibility issues). To me, Perl is a very complex, immemorable and stupid language: but many people love it. It is the right size and provides the right breadth for a decent class of applications, to them. Where it goes right is by having modules IMHO. But yuck. Rick
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








