• From: Matt Sergeant <matt@s...>
• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 17:05:49 +0100 (BST)

On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Eric van der Vlist wrote:

> This is a good explanation of why the namespace URI discussion has been
> so full of rebounds and a sensible suggestion.
> 
> My take on this is that, especially because we are building on moving
> and abstract grounds, great care should be taken to describe in great
> detail how these URI references should be processed and to answer to the
> basic questions :
> 
>  - are relative references allowed ?

Can anyone give me a really good concrete use for relative namespace
URI's, aside from saving a few keystrokes?

-- 
<Matt/>

Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
Email for training and consultancy availability.
http://sergeant.org | AxKit: http://axkit.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URI concerns continue
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: URI concerns continue
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URI concerns continue
• Next by Date: RE: power uses of XML vs. simple uses of XML
• Previous by thread: Re: URI concerns continue
• Next by thread: Re: URI concerns continue
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread