[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Chris Pratt" <chris@p...>
  • To: <xml-dev@x...>, "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:43:00 -0700

Is there a better way to utilize multiple DTD's?
    (*Chris*)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>
To: "Chris Pratt" <chris@p...>; <xml-dev@x...>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple DTD's


> At 01:12 PM 07/07/00 -0700, Chris Pratt wrote:
> ><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
> >"DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd" [
> >  <!ENTITY % aml SYSTEM "DTD/aml.dtd">
> >    %aml;
> >]>
> >
> >And everything was working fine until I added the following to the
aml.dtd
> >file:
> >
> ><!ENTITY % boolean "(true | false)">
> >
> ><!ELEMENT test ANY>
> > <!ATTLIST test name CDATA #REQUIRED
> >                value CDATA #IMPLIED
> >                isnull %boolean; "false"
>
> This would work fine if you did it in the external subset, but it's
> in the internal (yes, pulled in by PE ref, but whatever) and you can't
> do partial-declaration PE references in the internal subset. -T.
>


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member