• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:56:51 +1000

At 20:04 26/07/2000, Joshua Allen wrote:

>OK, I have looked more closely and Word's output is not entirely
>"well-formed".  On the other hand, it displays nicely in a
>wide range of browsers.  Also, it took me only five minutes
>to figure out what I need to do to the file to be able
>to run XSL transforms against it using Saxon, Xalan, etc.
>grep|tr|cut can do wonders..

There aren't shades of grey here:
It's either "well-formed", or not.

There is no "almost XML".

J


-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Word output as XML? (was RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?)
    • From: Cedric ROUVRAIS <crouvrais@o...>

• References:
  • RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
    • From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
• Next by Date: Re: UNIX pipes, XML processing
• Previous by thread: RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
• Next by thread: RE: Word output as XML? (was RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread