[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?

• From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:40:20 -0700

Perhaps I misunderstand Jonathan Borden's comments, when he writes 

  I've designed XMOP ... to
  serialize objects. This format is similar to SOAP, but focusses on
  serialization of the entire object rather than making a single method call
  or property get/set.

SOAP section five specifically provides serialization rules for entire
objects or graphs of objects. Its use is not limited to method calls but is
a general facility for serialization.  

See http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml/general/soapspec.asp

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@l...>
  • RE: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: (No Subject)
• Next by Date: RE: XML-based GUI definition
• Previous by thread: Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
• Next by thread: RE: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread