• From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>
• To: "Ashvil" <ashvil@i...>
• Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2000 18:38:15 -0400

At 14:54 01/07/2000 -0700, Ashvil wrote:
>The other part of the equation was the ContentEditable attribute in
>IE5.5 which let you make the content areas editable [2].
>
>I was thinking creating a simple XML editor which would let you edit
>some data in a rich content view like MS Word document where only
>certain fields are allowed to be editable using IE5.5.

In that case maybe you don't need XSLT ? Given that your editor can
understand style you could display the original data in a rich content view
using CSS or FO, allowing the user to edit it directly.



-- robin b.
"What I like about deadlines is the lovely whooshing sound they make as
they rush past." --Douglas Adams


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Can XSLT be bi-directional ? XML + XSLT -> XHTML -> XML + (XSLT)
    • From: "Ashvil" <ashvil@i...>

• References:
  • Re: Can XSLT be bi-directional ? XML + XSLT -> XHTML -> XML + (XSLT)
    • From: Amy Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • RE: Can XSLT be bi-directional ? XML + XSLT -> XHTML -> XML + (XSLT)
    • From: "Ashvil" <ashvil@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can XSLT be bi-directional ? XML + XSLT -> XHTML -> XML + (XSLT)
• Next by Date: Re: Can XSLT be bi-directional ? XML + XSLT -> XHTML -> XML + (XSLT)
• Previous by thread: RE: Can XSLT be bi-directional ? XML + XSLT -> XHTML -> XML + (XSLT)
• Next by thread: RE: Can XSLT be bi-directional ? XML + XSLT -> XHTML -> XML + (XSLT)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread