|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why I dislike CSS
Simon St.Laurent writes: > I can't use a validating XML parser to verify that my XSLT is correct, > except inasfar as it is well-formed, either. XSLT's design bascially makes > such verification impossible That's very harsh. The RenderX work shows that you can go a long way with DTDs, and I am sure something like Schematron could provide an excellent XSLFO validator. > CSS isn't 'part of the family' because it was around long before XSL, and > was basically ahead of the curve as far as convinving HTML developers that > separating style from content was a good idea. Shame it didn't have that effect, then :-} > I really dislike being forced to use XSL, but figure that the perpetual > delays on XSL-FOs might spare me from having to use a grotesquely clunky > language to solve the kinds of simple work that CSS does very elegantly. So, what *do* you use for Amy's Mom and Pop printing work? You have a CSS implementation that does Word-standard pagination? > So apart from the fact that CSS isn't XML, it seems to fit your needs. Why > not do a simple bit of XML-izing? Thats exactly what she did, didnt she? and she ended up with what looks to me like a subset of XSL FO. Which seems to prove to me that the XSL FO *do* follow the CSS work? Sebastian *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








