[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: FOs again

• From: "Gregg Reynolds" <greynolds@g...>
• To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:41:53 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xml-dev@x... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@x...]On Behalf Of
> Bullard, Claude L (Len)
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 9:05 AM
>
> The term you may be looking for is page integrity.  This

Don't you want "Fidelity", instead of integrity?

> drafts could barely get cited at all.   The 28001
> customer wanted page fidelity (necessary for legal
> documents),

Probably more important for document maintenance using loose-leaf change
packets.  "This page replaces page 1358" is real hard to do if you can't
reliably track pagebreaks (or even line breaks, for placing change bars)
when recomposing.

-gregg


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: FOs again
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xslv updated
• Next by Date: RE: xslv updated
• Previous by thread: RE: FOs again
• Next by thread: RE: FOs again
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread