|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Syntax and semantics
Dave Winer wrote: > David, this came up at the xml protocols shakedown yesterday at www9, and > i've never understood how it can work. At some point human beings > must agree > to something. From there it's a matter of saying something is > equivalent to > what they agreed to. So bfd. You have the equivalent of a #define. Unless > I'm missing something which is why I'm posting this message. > Please help me > understand where the rocket science is here. Dave >You have the equivalent of a #define Yes I don't disagree, it's just that the 'definitions' will have to be more rigorous. This will be the mother of all bfds. Message interchange over the Internet poses different problems from what has occurred in the past. I don't think that there is anything wrong with saying that a message can convey semantics or signs that does not mean to say that a machine will know how to interpret them, a message which is a picture of a pipe is not a pipe. However, arguments about semantics always seem to become circular... they end up being over semantics. DG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . David Galbraith - Chief Architect Moreover.com - the webfeed company david@m... 415-577-8828 (US) 0777-565-8880 (UK) favorite webfeed: http://www.moreover.com/xml *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








