[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: file: URIs and MS Windows

• From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: 1 May 2000 16:19:45 GMT

Tom Passin wrote:

>The RFC (RFC 1738) defines them quite clearly, except for possibly the use
>of the colon after a drive letter ("c:").

Yes, the drive letter is the non-obvious point.

(Though to be pedantic, what RFC1738 says is that the path part of the
URL is a hierarchical directory path, not that it necessarily
corresponds directly to the hierarchy in the filesystem.  I suppose
you *could* use backslashes (perhaps escaped) and get a very flat and
useless hierarchy.)

>So according to the RFC, the following are legal:
>
>file://localhost/c:/xml/xsl.bat
>file:///c:/xml/xsl.bat

I had always supposed (until I looked at the RFC) that things like

  file:/foo/bar

were legal, since that's what Netscape gives me on Unix when I open a
file.  I can't find any justification for it; is there a generic URI
rule anywhere that says a URI with no //host part is equivalent to the
same with an empty string as the host?

Thanks,
  -- Richard
-- 
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.

"The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high
speed networks." - Sam Wilson

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: file: URIs and MS Windows
    • From: tpassin@h...

• Prev by Date: Re: List server: another test of web archives...
• Next by Date: RE: Schema compiler status
• Previous by thread: Re: file: URIs and MS Windows
• Next by thread: Re: file: URIs and MS Windows
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread