|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: SOAP, plague, love
As Mike suggests, the headers provide an extensibility framework. They provide a place for security information, and should be composable with the XML signature work done at the W3C. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Sharp [mailto:msharp@l...] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 10:10 AM To: xml-dev@x... Subject: Re: SOAP, plague, love That's what the SOAP Header element is for, to provide for just such a mechanism, in a transport neutral way. For a simple example, put your PGP public key in the header element of your request, and I'll return an encrypted response in the body. Same goes for authentication. I don't see why the envelope has to be encrypted, just the contents. Regards, Mike Sharp Yes, it's possible to send SOAP over an encrypted circuit such as SSL, but SOAP is supposed to be transport agnostic. How would the encryption be handled over SMTP, where there is no SSL? Dick Brooks http://www.8760.com/ *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








