[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

• From: burtonator <burton@r...>
• To: xml-editor@w..., "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:54:27 -0700

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> The XML Core WG would like input from the xml-dev public, particularly
> those of you who have implemented XML parsers, on the following points:
> 
> Issue PE28:
> 
> Currently the XML Recommendation is silent about the handling of
> documents that contain "impossible" bytes.  For example, the byte 0xFF
> cannot appear in any UTF-8 encoded document.  We are considering making
> such violations of the encoding a fatal error.

+1024

This is really needed.  The RSS space has XML from many remote sources
(currently about 1700 URLs).  I have noticed that a significant
percentage of these contain illegal characters which just basically
break things.  I am having to filter out this info with a text processor
and *then* pass it to my XML parser.  This is just too much of a
kludge.  People should be required to fix their XML if they want it to
work in a universal manner.  A good portion of the RSS producers don't
know that their XML is flawed even though it might be considered
well-formed by most parsers.

Kevin

-- 
Kevin A Burton (burton@a...)
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN:  "Please Open Source Java!"
I just patented "one click e-mail", when you hit the "reply" button you 
own me 50 cents.

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread