[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Ambiguity in XML spec

• From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: 19 May 2000 13:09:24 GMT

In article <B1C2D4514427D2118C2E00104B3054A4D636B0@m...>,
Brown, Bryan <bryanb@u...> wrote:

>Ok, well I have a parser that i wrote from scratch, and of the 83 or so
>productions this is the only one my parser has a problem with.

Well, to be blunt, that's something you have to fix in your parser,
either by changing your code or giving it alternative production rules
such as the ones you describe.  The grammar in the spec describes the
language correctly, and the productions in question can be used
directly with compiler-generators like yacc.

Incidentally, there's at least one case in the spec where the
productions *do* have a bug.  Productions 43 and 14 inadvertently
allow, say, <a>   ]]>   </a> (this will be corrected by a
soon-to-be-published erratum).  I believe this was found by someone
implementing a parser directly from the grammar rules.

-- Richard
-- 
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.

"The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high
speed networks." - Sam Wilson

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: Steve Schafer <pandeng@t...>

• References:
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: "Brown, Bryan" <bryanb@u...>

• Prev by Date: [ANNOUNCE] XML Spy 3.0 release version is now available
• Next by Date: Test suite suggestion
• Previous by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Next by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread