|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: New internet draft on layering protocols on top of HTTP
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > >Give it time. The W3C is *not* a place to do protocols, while the IETF > >is *the* place to do them. Seems like a no brainer to me. > > The no-brainer for me is that many protocols may not rate a trip through > the IETF or any other organization, and that ad hoc is likely to prevail > over organized and even necessarily coherent. Those are not mutually exclusive. One can develop protocols in an ad-hoc fashion, but then submit them to the IETF for consideration for one of the tracks. I've never known any work that started inside the IETF, except as a fallout of another working group. It would be a major mistake not to use the experience that is contained within the IETF organization. > (XML already has enough internal interoperability problems that I fear > we're used to them by now...) Sad but true. > I didn't say it was a very bad thing, and I don't actually think it's a bad > thing. I don't stay up at night worrying whether a particular URL is good > for a particular task - part of what we've learned from the Web is that > some level of 404 Not Found is okay. So once we let this genie out of the bottle, how do we keep "some level" under control? MB *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








