|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: conventions for case of names?
>"proper noun" form for element types and all lower-case for attribute names. The possibility had occurred to me when looking over UML and its immediate predecessors, but I haven't seen anyone else use it for XML. >P.S. It's your project -- what works best for you? Isn't this the real beauty of XML vs. HTML and >other "standard" markup syntax? No particular way is clearly better for now, which is why I'm curious about practices that may or may not be settling in out there. If either of two ways works fine, then going with the way more consistent with the practice of others can help interoperability (even if it just means human readability when using names from multiple namespaces) with other systems. An interesting debate here was about the value of starting with uppercase so that Hungarian prefixes (see http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/techart/hunganotat.htm for a nice summary) could be prepended when useful, but "when useful" broke down, since they deal with a lower level of abstraction. (And thanks for cc'ing me--I'm still not getting regular xml-dev postings; it looks like I have to resubscribe.) Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@ snee.com> "The elements be kind to thee, and make thy spirits all of comfort!" Anthony and Cleopatra, III ii *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








