[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Bullard bounce back

• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 20:19:30 -0500

Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> 
> On occasions in the past I and other members of the list have urged that
> replies be only to the list unless requested. This saves a poster getting
> two identical replies to a message.
> 
> Is this something that people still care about?

Yes.  Copying the intended receiver is often the faster way to 
ensure that they have the message with time to reply.

Please, Peter, you have a good heart, but quit adjusting our 
manners so often.  Really.  We are adults and the rate of 
tapping on our wrists is reminiscent of a doting grandfather 
who has yet to discover the grandchildren are on their 
own now.  We all know how this works.

len



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Duplicate postings [Re: Bullard bounce back]
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• References:
  • Re: Bullard bounce back
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: The Dow Of Groves
• Next by Date: Re: Babel (again) or standard taqs and aliases (UDEF, Bizcodes)
• Previous by thread: Re: Bullard bounce back
• Next by thread: Duplicate postings [Re: Bullard bounce back]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread