[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Date: Wed, 24 May 100 21:17:39 -0400 (EDT)

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> XML second edition?

> Could we have a little more explanation of said project?

Yes, sorry, should have done that in the first place.  There is a list
of XML errata at http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-19980210-errata , which is
slowly growing as the XML Core WG finds wording problems, infelicities,
pointless incompatibilities with SGML, and so on.  This material
is officially part of the XML Recommendation, but it's hard to use.

XML 1.0, Second Edition, will incorporate the published errata into
the text of the XML Recommendation.  It is not XML 1.1.  It is not
considered a substantial change in XML.

John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
	Yes, I know the message date is bogus.  I can't help it.
		--me, on far too many occasions

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• References:
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD to XPath
• Next by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread