[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: NEWBIE -> RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)

• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 09:18:53 +0100

At 01:25 PM 4/7/00 -0700, Tony Pelton wrote:
>
>I am an XML novice for sure compared to the people on this list ... please
>be gentle.

We are, Tony!

>
>Watching this 'URL -> DTD' thread ...
>
>Is there a reason why an XML document is not allowed to carry it's own DTD ?

[... answered by Normal Walsh, I think...]

We welcome your contribution - there are probably many others who
appreciate the answer to it. It may appear simple, but actually - as Norman
showed - it impacts on the development and use of tools. Note that we ask
everyone to be considerate in how they quote material. You are forgiven
:-), but please can everyone try to snip unnecessary quoted material and
especially the list signature.

	P.



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • NEWBIE -> RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: Tony Pelton <tonyp@s...>

• Prev by Date: Document Feature Requirements [was: Common XML ...]
• Next by Date: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Previous by thread: Re: NEWBIE -> RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by thread: SAX2 XSLT
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread