|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Topic Maps and AF
Ok... I'm finding the following statements *a little* contradictory. Topic Maps, as I understood the ISO/IEC 13250 standard to say, is a particular usage of Architecture Forms. It seems no different than, say, how Architecture Forms are just a particular usage of DTDs. The specification seems completely encouched in AF. Steven R. Newcomb said: >The Topic Maps spec, which seems to be newsworthy these days, is an >inheritable architecture. It's good that XLink has turned out to be >a set of architectural forms, because XML Topic Maps (among many >other applications) must inherit the extended XLink syntax and >semantics. So... something doesn't jive - Topic Maps inherit from both XLink syntax and encouched in AF? Perhaps I'm missing some pieces here (I'm hoping! :-) ). - Is there an "XML-ified" version/spec of Topic Maps, and if so, where can I find it? - If not, it seems odd that Topic maps, being newsworthy, needs and rides on top of AF, which seems to not be newsworthy (depending on viewpoints, but let's speculate for the moment). Any reasons? I'm liking what Topic Map brings to the table in terms of drawing relations between topics, so if there is any work going on this area, I'd love a pointer, too. Thanks very much, /David *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








