[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Structured attributes

• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: Al Gilman <asgilman@i...>
• Date: 03 Mar 2000 16:34:50 +0000

Al Gilman <asgilman@i...> writes:

> We should stick to defining the semantics in a competent model-writing
> language and then bind that semantics to XML syntax by a straightforward
> injection of the names from the domain into an XML grammar.

I absolutely agree.  I said nothing about semantics in my post, and I
strongly agree that the syntax/semanticss linkage must be handled
separately.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: Structured attributes
    • From: Al Gilman <asgilman@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Structured attributes
• Next by Date: RE: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
• Previous by thread: Re: Structured attributes
• Next by thread: Re: Structured attributes + Groves
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread