|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Structured attributes
"Henry S. Thompson" wrote: > > I should have made clear that this was a language-level proposal: if > the language changed this way, it would be a separate question what > mechanisms XML Schema would/should provide in v.2 to provice for > schema-validation of uses of the new language feature. I should have made clear that my message was just a joke. :-) BTW: I like the fact that the new schema proposal is more layered. Wouldn't it be possible to go one little step further in this direction and put the types into the layer of named groups etc, too? Elements could be defined just like your structured attribute example. Just add an "extends" attribute to the element definitions for semantic and structural inheritage from other elements. You cannot derive from an element without structure inheritage in the current proposal anyway. Types could still be used for powerful structure reuse w/o semantic consequences, expanded by the preprocessor layer. Thus, we would reach a very simple layer containing the minimum only, but not lose any of the possibilities in the current specs. Best regards, Stefan -- Stefan Haustein University of Dortmund Computer Science VIII www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








