|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Anti-Ranti
> > Curiously, the official W3C process expects all non-members to wait > > till "Proposed Recommendation" or (new) "Candidate Recommendation" > > to express opinions. An "appropriate" moment is already defined. > > That's not what the W3C Process Document section on WG deliverable > says: Seconded. That's NOT the intent. The working groups very much want feedback as early as possible. We don't have any vested interest in inventing all the details ourselves, and we _REALLY_ don't want to get all the way to Last Call/CR/PR only to discover that we overlooked a critical use case -- or even a simple/obvious/easy detail. Early input is very much appreciated. I believe that every WG has a public mailing list for discussion of the working drafts. Use it. Use it well enough and volunteer enough time to the cause, and you might even find yourself invited to join the Interest Group... which in some cases differs from WG membership mainly in not having a vote. Of course that doesn't mean all suggestions will be accepted. Heck, not all suggestions from within a WG are accepted; it's a committee, and there are honest disagreements about what solutions are best. And sometimes schedules and available manpower limit what can be done. But the comments and questions on the public list _are_ read and taken seriously. I'm having trouble putting my hands on it now, but someone's webpage includes an "Outsider's Guide to the W3C" which is a good intro to the process. Here's my own brief attempt. Feedback is needed at every stage! Public Working Drafts (WD) are released specifically with the intent of requesting public comment. (There are nonpublic WD's in between these, mostly for use within the working group, tracking the spec's evolution.) Last Call (LC) is a public WD and a public call for final sanity-check of the overall design. Candidate Recommendation (CR), added recently, is an "implementation period". When a spec goes from LC to CR, that's a statement that the WG thinks the design is stable and wants folks to go off and start building code and reporting their experience. The goal is to make sure that the spec really is complete -- no ambiguities or missing data -- and can be implemented in a reasonable manner. CR is also a promise that no more major changes will occur unless a problem is exposed -- so it's a good time for you to start working on your prototypes in any case, even if you weren't willing to track the evolution of the WD. Generally, getting out of CR phase requires that several successful implementations have been reported... or that the unimplemented sections be dropped from the spec. Ppoposal (PR) is an official request for the W3C members to vote on whether this spec should be accepted as a W3C Recommendation. This is the one stage where non-Members really don't have a direct voice; if you aren't a Member, you can't vote. Finally, if the votes are in favor, the specification becomes a Reccomendation (REC), which is as official as the W3C ever gets. At that point, the spec is pretty much cast in concrete... but is often still looking for input for the next "level", or for other tools based on this one, so the process repeats from the beginning. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








