|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: A certain difficulty
David Megginson wrote: > Stefan Haustein writes: > > > So the question arises "Is the model over-simplified, > > is the XML syntax uneccesary complicated, or both?" > > Those are separate questions. I believe that the XML syntax is > unnecessarily complicated, that the model is unnecessarily > complicated, and that the spec misrepresents the actual model used. > For example, aboutEachPrefix is not a problem with the XML syntax, > it's a complication in the model itself. Hm, while I agree that the syntax is unnecessarily complicated, I cannot see how the presented model (not the model reverse engineered from the xml syntax) can be simplified further. I would for example prefer the "bag/sequence"-thing as first class member in the model, thus a more complicated model. For my application it's just simpler to allow several occurences of an arc with the same label than having tons of inbetween objects (bags) floating around. Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Haustein University of Dortmund Computer Science VIII www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








