Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
Paul Grosso wrote: > It would have been nice if Schema 1.0 had been something minimal > based on "DTD capabilities in XML instance syntax plus some basic > data types". Then not only would it have been available long > ago... Isn't that about what x-schemas were per the open list (ask Simon) that started working on them before they became a W3C work project? Paul, you've done this long enough to know the way of it. SAX works. A net protocol for SGML could have worked. Lots of good ideas would have worked but we stuck to our organizations and our committees and our MEGO documents. It might be time to change. I'm not working on a revolution; maybe a seachange, a realization among us that the closed committee way is not working. Maybe something like SAX, the benevolently lead, slightly dictatorial but totally exposed way works best. So far, it produced HTML, VRML and SAX. So far these have worked. The thing that does not work is "Internet Time". How about just "internet process"? We yak until we get rough consensus and some running code. Tell me, can groves be applied and if they can, is there a good reason to do it? Anyone? len
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format